Does the particular elements discussed from the 4th Amendment in relation to the American citizen’s rights go too far, or not far enough?
No. 67
Argued December 12, 1967
Decided June 10, 1968
392 U.S. 1
No. 82-256
Argued February 23, 1983
Decided July 6, 1983
463 U.S. 1032
No. 759
Argued February 28-March 1, 1966
Decided June 13, 1966*
384 U.S. 436
No. 34
Argued April 17, 1962
Restored to the calendar for reargument June 25, 1962
Reargued January 16, 1963
Decided March 18, 1963
372 U.S. 353
No. 236
Argued March 29, 1961
Decided June 19, 1961
367 U.S. 643
Libertas Civics Camp Lesson
Topic: U.S. Constitution 4th Amendment: Frisk and the Exclusionary Rule
Objective: We will define, analyze and draw conclusions about elements of the 4th Amendment and how they apply to citizen’s rights.
Closing Task: I will complete an assessment to demonstrate my understanding of the topic discussed and provide my critique of the law. I will create a project to inform and increase the public’s understanding of the following provisions within the 4th Amendment:
Activities:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
-U.S. Constitution, Amendment IV